How ITC got around its late entry
disadvantage to chew off a chunk of the biscuits market.
Biscuits and tea in the morning were a
routine. So were the key market players and their favourite products.
The two major players Britannia and Parle
were busy biting of chunks of the national market among themselves, with a host of smaller
brands in various regions.
While the business was still very
competitive, there wasnt anything groundbreaking. In 2003, with ITC foraying into
the segment, a lot of that changed.
At that time, Britannia and Parle held,
between them over 82 per cent of the market in value terms. The rest too was firmly held
by smaller players like Priya Gold which had a strong presence in the north. So, in
essence, the market already had strong well entrenched players. So how could a late
entrant like ITC make its mark?
Three years down the line, however, things
have changed a lot. It is a classic story of the hare and the tortoise. While it is far
from winning the race, slowly and steadily, the tortoise is gaining ground.
The late entrant is already on the podium
in the third place with as much as 7 per cent of the market in terms of value. ITC
made hay when the sun wasnt shining, says a consultant whos been
tracking the industry for a long time. But first, why did ITC train its eye on biscuits?
Ravi Naware, chief executive, ITC Foods, makes it sound simple.
We decided to enter the foods segment
because its a Rs 550,000 crore market in India. But only 6 per cent of this is
branded and packaged. In developed markets, nearly 95 per cent of the food market is
branded and packaged. So there was lot of scope for a branded player.
In foods, biscuits was tempting. The Rs
4,000-crore Indian biscuits market has grown at 12-14 per cent year-on-year. Then, there
was a business synergy. ITC was already value-adding to wheat with its branded atta
presence. By entering the biscuits segment, it could also improve its bottomline further.
But despite the fast growth rates, the
biscuits industry was not all rosy. Over the years, even giants like Hindustan Lever had
failed.
For instance, HLL which had flirted with
biscuits under the Max brand exited in 2005. But ITCs Sunfeast has a different story
to tell so far. the strategist looks at the gameplan of a late entrant and how the
biscuits industry has responded.
New recipe
Before entering the segment, ITC dug into market research. Research revealed that the
category had gaps which ITC could settle into. Findings revealed that consumers wished to
taste new and innovative products. That was precisely what the competition had not done in
a big way.
Says Naware, The biscuits industry
had witnessed little innovation; Glucose was Glucose and Marie was still Marie. The
company decided that this could be its biggest point of attack. In 2003, ITC launched
Sunfeast with six ranges. But it was a calculated risk. ITC stuck to category favourites
like Glucose, Marie and Bourbon cream.
Along with that, it also launched
innovations such as orange-flavoured Marie, Marie light and butterscotch-flavoured cream
biscuits. In 2004, Sunfeast followed this up with the launch of Sunfeast Milky Magic. More
recently, it also has launched the Sunfeast Snacky and Sunfeast Golden Bakes.
Analysts believe that just because Sunfeast
was a new brand, helped matters. Says a consultant, The biscuits industry had not
witnessed any major product innovation in years. Consumers were just waiting for something
new, something fresh, when Sunfeast happened.
Even the competition had not made things
better. Between 2000 and 2005 neither Parle nor Britannia launched any major new product.
Yes, Britannia did re-launch its Tiger brand in 2005.
But Britannia claims that it is looking at
more than just products. Richa Arora, general manager and head of marketing and
innovations, Britannia Industries, says, We are not just looking at new products,
but tapping newer opportunities such as different occasions as well as out-of-home
consumptions.
In 2005, before Diwali, Britannia launched
Occasions boxes of assorted biscuits priced between Rs 50 and Rs 200 which
the company claims has been very successful.
In 2006, however, the industry has seen a
flurry of innovations from the big two. Digestive Marie was launched by Parle in
early February 2006. Britannia launched its new double-flavoured Mariegold and 50-50
Chakkar. And Parle is all set to launch at least two new products before the end of this
year.
Distribution maze
Its common knowledge, that for FMCG products, distribution channels are very
important.
Says Pravin Kulkarni, general manager,
marketing, Parle Products, For biscuits, distribution and visibility are extremely
important as its partly a impulse purchase product. And in biscuits, setting
up a distribution channel is anything but easy.
Consider this. Priya Gold, which entered
the western region in 2000, is struggling to find its feet even five years later.
However, in this regard, Sunfeast has been
fortunate: thanks to its tobacco business, ITC already had a good understanding of
distribution channels.
The company used its existing network of
convenience stores the companys name for the hole-in-the-wall pan-beedi shops
for Sunfeast. Not content with the existing resources, the company also looked at
grocery stores and other retail formats.
The company says the brand is now available
in nearly 1.8 million outlets. Britannia claims it has a superior distribution clout with
its presence in nearly 3.3 million outlets. Parle, the seasoned player itself, says it is
available in 1.5 million outlets. Sunfeasts next step was to step up its branding
and promotion.
Ad thrust
In August 2003, a month after its launch, the company undertook a major sampling exercise
to promote the product. For two years then, the brand did all the usual rounds
riding behind buses, blocking television spots, booking that corner space in your
favourite newspaper and so on.
Well differentiated advertisements, some
which showed a complete cream world with cream rivers, cream mountains and cream trees,
were targeted at kids watching cartoon channels.
At the same time, on general entertainment
channels, mothers received information on the importance of glucose, the wholeness of
wheat and so on. Also, the company tied up with Bey Blades, the popular television series
that was a rage among children, to promote itself.
In April 2005, Sunfeast launched its major
campaign. It signed on Hindi film actor, Shah Rukh Khan as its brand ambassador.
In the same year, as the official sponsor
of the WTA tennis championship titled the Sunfeast Open the company had
teenage sensations Sania Mirza and Mahesh Bhupathi campaigning for it. But thats not
all. For promotions in southern states, Sunfeast has signed Tamil super star Surya as a
brand ambassador.
Analysts say that ITCs deep pockets
have helped Sunfeast in many ways.
The company claims that it has been
spending 35-40 per cent of its turnover from the biscuits segment on advertising and
promotions. Going by that number, ITCs annual marketing spends are estimated to be in the
region of about Rs 115-120 crore.
Until last year, Priya Gold spent close to
Rs 45-50 crore, nearly 10 per cent of its turnover on marketing. Even market leader
Britannia with spends of Rs 100 crore (2004-05) spends about 10 per cent of sales on
marketing.
But Arora says that the figure will
increase substantially in 2006-07. ITC is clearly among the largest spender on ads and
promotions in the biscuits category.
Analysts predict that these figures are all
set to rise this year. But industry experts arent impressed.
Says a consultant, Although
Sunfeasts Shah Rukh Khan association is interesting, it is yet to do something
groundbreaking, like Britannia khao world cup jhao or the Lagaan promotion for that
matter.
Pricing models
The biscuits industry now has two clear models. Parle products plays the low price game at
all varieties of biscuits from glucose to cream.
Essentially, Parle plays a high volume, low
margin game. But Britannia and Sunfeast look at a two-pronged strategy. High margins in
cream variants and volumes from the Marie and Glucose segments.
For instance, cream biscuits from both
Britannia and Sunfeast cost Rs 10 for 100 grams. Parle, however, only charges Rs 5 for its
cream variants. Except for Hide & Seek, all of Parles products lie in the price
range between Rs 4 and Rs 6 for 100 gram packs.
To be fair, in Glucose and Marie, the
companies have little choice. As there is little differentiation, consumers are extremely
price sensitive. But these segments are important. Marie and the popular glucose varieties
make up for nearly 55 per cent of the Rs 4,000 crore biscuits segment a significant
Rs 2,200 crore.
Says Sunil Alagh, chairman, SKA Advisors,
and former CEO of Britannia Industries, the biscuit consumer is willing to pay more
only when he sees a clearly differentiated product. Hence companies have little choice in
terms of pricing. No wonder all the Glucose and Marie variants straddle price points
of Rs 4-6 (for 100 grams).
Key challenges
Back in 2003, nobody thought Sunfeast would have consumers eating out of its hands. Says
Naware, Seven per cent in less than three years is something that we could have only
dreamt about.
Importantly, industry barometer AC Nielsen
has indicated that both Parle and Britannia are losing market shares. According to the AC
Nielsen retail sales audit in March 2006, both Britannia and Parle have lost volumes.
Britannias shares have dropped from 35.8 per cent in 2004-05 to 30.5 per cent in May
2006 (volumes). Parles shares have also dropped from 42.2 to 38.4 per cent in the
same period.
Even Priya Gold has seen a minor dip from
6.4 per cent to 5 per cent. ITCs Sunfeast has been a big gainer with its share
increasing from 2.7 to 6.7 per cent.
In terms of value, Britannia leads the
market with 37 per cent market share, followed by Parles 31.3 per cent and
ITCs 6.3 per cent. Nevertheless, the gap is still wide. Sunfeast still has a long
way to go.
But what can the bigger players do? Alagh
has an interesting observation. Says he, Biscuits have always been a low margin,
high volume game. Both Britannia and Parle have very high volumes and can easily afford to
lower their margins.
A potential after-effect? Sunfeast too may
have to drop its prices to be in the reckoning and this will squeeze its margin even
lower. While the full game is yet to be played out, for the moment the sun seems to be
shining on Sunfeast.